Is Karpal Singh stupid?

by fellow Malaysian blogger Malaysia Waves:

"Karpal still doesn't get it. The time for opposition politics is over. Now, the PR is faced with a mountain of practical issues to overcome and making enemies with:

a. The majority race (malays)
b. The royalty
c. The Islamic faith

is not going to help each and every PR government in carrying out their duties.

Karpal need to wake up and smell the coffee. The time for rhetoric and empty threats is over. The reason why Karpal is not getting resonance from fellow DAP leaders is because they are all in the business of “getting things done”.

And practically, handling issues which is of not in the majority of the public’s interest is not a big priority on their agenda. What’s important now is to deliver what has been promised in the last election.

And I am sure that making enemies with the Palace is one sure way of getting yourself in a hot soup for no major gain.

My point being is that let us tackle issues that’s of public’s interest and not of your own individual political ideology agenda which is most of the time unpopular with the public.

The public wants to see the government deliver. That’s the #1 agenda for all. And the Malaysian public is a very pragmatic type of public, including the Chinese. That explains why the level of support of the Chinese to Dr. Mahathir when he was PM was consistent since 1990.

Despite the fact that Dr. Mahathir is a racist, a bigot, an ardent supporter of National Economic Policies and not to mention Malay Rights, the Chinese electorate came to his rescue in the 1999 elections and gave BN a rousing support in 2004 all because of him.

Karpal and his band of misfits should ask themselves, why is this so? How can a man who’s belief structure is heaven and earth apart from the Chinese can get so much of the Chinese support?

The answer is simple. Dr. Mahathir delivered. During the time of his reign, the Chinese experienced economic uplifting never before experienced under any other Prime Ministers. For that, the Chinese threw their support behind Dr. Mahathir come what may. In fact, the level of support for Dr. M among the Chinese did not wane even after he made his Negara Islam declaration.

DAP should remember this for in 1995, Dr. Mahathir nearly routed DAP from the map of Malaysia. In 1999, if it wouldn’t for the support of the Chinese, the BN government would have fallen with their face down. The Chinese defended the rule of Dr. Mahathir despite Dr. Mahathir being the opposite of the Chinese political beliefs.

Karpal, for one, have not learnt his lesson. Karpal needs to evaluate an issue and differentiate between issues which is “realpolitik” and “elitepolitik” of nature. It seems most of the PR leaders are aware of this except Karpal.

As a result of Karpal’s non-discriminatory actions, the BN has found an opportunity to drive a wedge between the PR leaders. Their insistence to indict Karpal for sedition is an attempt to drive a wedge between the PR leaders (http://www.malaysia-today.net/2008/content/view/7187/1/)

One should ask, why indict Karpal on this issue alone? Why wasn’t there an indiction on his other statements before? The reason is that the parties involved in this issue are members of the PR specifically PAS.

The BN is trying to catch PAS in an awkward situation. Karpal’s statement was in defense of the Perak MB’s action to sack the Director of JAIP. It will be very awkward for the MB of Perak not to defend Karpal. On the other hand, if the MB of Perak or PAS do not come out to defend Karpal, then it will show that there is no solidarity among the PR component parties.

But, the fact that no other DAP leaders coming out to support Karpal shows that Karpal is guilty of becoming a loose cannon. And PR do not need loose cannon, especially with someone like Karpal Singh.

So, my suggestion to PR leaders is to leave Karpal to his own devices and let him sink and swim with his statements. Pretty soon, the public will see that most of Karpal statements do not represent the DAP or PR in any way."

But We UMNO also got sedition mah!

Well.. there are couple of questions they need to ask Pak lah. He seems to be "makan cili tidak tahu pedas"

1. Pelantikan MB Terengganu, Umno has made a lot of sedition remark to Sultan .... remember the "Natang" word ? And pak la himself did said "Unconstitutional" on regard of pelantikan MB ? Why no action has been taken so far ? but action being taken to those are no Umno/BN supporter ?


The above is an example ..... ban example by far menyakit teringga bila mendengar !!

Me, fellow bloggers, Malaysiakini and the rakyat have been wondering.......

WHY IS THIS IDIOT STILL AN MP?

After the recent Parliament session.......



and last year's stupid sexist remark against Batu Gajah MP....



and another previous debate with Batu Gajah MP.....



Why did Bung Mokhtar took part in this year's Election and win again!? No offense to fellow Kinabatangans, but are you guys stupid or something? Has YB Radin given you guys free smack just to re-elect him?

If Karpal's Big Monkey, and Bung's Big Foot, then i'm Big Sohai!

Seriously, what a shitty way to start the parliament:

What Malaysia needs is a sexual revolution, and i'm serious.

There has been significant shifts in social attitudes, behaviours and institutional regulations surrounding sexuality since Freud opened the door to the bedroom. Sexuality throughout the 20th century has moved closer to the centre of public debate than ever before. One hundred years ago the idea of sexual politics would have been unthinkable. For many in the lecture today the 1960s which unleashed the so called sexual revolution seems more a source of comic relief and tragic nostalgic recirculation than political inspiration. Throughout the late 1960s and early 1970s the combination of student protests, counter culture movements and medically prescribed contraceptives ushered in a decisive break with the preceding values which prescribed confinement of women’s sexual pleasure within the suburban walls of heterosexual marriage and the regulation of man’s sexuality in the public. D.H Lawrence may have shocked an earlier generation with Lady Chatterley’s extramarital sexual independence, but it was not until the 1970s that women’s sexuality outside marriage became widely accepted.


-From the essay The Sexual Revolution of the 60s by isis Creations

Those were the words of the 1960s. In the time of Johnson's Vietnam stupidity and post-McCarthyist self-individuality, Americans & Brits looks toward a new form of enlightenment: Sex. The age of the hippie where a women can choose their man without any of the 1950's "perfectionist" criteria being shoved down their throats. If the 50's show that women choose their husband through criterias like money, looks and a happy suburban life, then in the 60's women choose choose their men through three things: Freedom, Personality and Sex.

However, here in Malaysia it's pretty much still the 50's by social terms. Girls choose their men by money and looks rather than personality. Got a nice car? You get a girlfriend. Handsome looks? Get a girlfriend. Lots of money? Get a girlfriend. Personality? Sense of humour? Good heart? Not needed.

Which is why most Malaysian girls you see are dating guys who are douchebags with long-hairs. I'm not generalising, but i'm being honest. A sexual revolution means that girls choose men by personality, freedom & sex. You don't need good looks, you don't need money, all you need is to have a good personality & be good in bed.

The hippies of the 60s may not have looks and money, but they are orgy-makers of all kinds. Most of these hippies were jocks, nerds, cheerleaders and such that were tired of the 50's conformist love model. They wanted men that could make them laugh rather than having good looks. They wanted men that could please them from the inside rather than from outside. That's sexual revolution.

And this is what Malaysia should be doing. A Malaysian sexual revolution would not just change a woman's view on men, but would also increase sexual productivity to a point Mahathir wanted by 2050. And not just that, it may reduce the chance of dumb MPs saying sexist things like 'bocor', and a sexual revolution would also give more role to for the Ministry of Women, Family & Community Development. Sure, Malaysian women are now free in terms of general feminism like equality & jobs, but in social feminist terms like sexual desires and long-term happiness, they are not free.

A school girl from a high school in Malaysia may have a boyfriend who is as gorgeous as Pete Wentz and has all the money as a result of his father who's a Datuk. But, he may be a douchebag on the inside, who has no sense of humour and no nice-guy attitude personality whatsoever. And the girl may have a crush on a guy who's nice and funny, but is too shy to like because he's not handsome and is not as rich as his current boyfriend.

We know the suffering you girls have. You girls wanted a man who's funny and nice, and decided to go for the douchebag because he has the looks and he's rich. I mean, if a girl goes for the handsome-less then other people will perceive you as a freak. I know, because i have seen dumb mistakes girls have made when i was in Cempaka. And for the lonely guys who can't get a girlfriend because he's not rich nor handsome: We know your pain. But you must know that the girl who's dating the handsome guy whom you envied may have a crush on you. Why? Because she knows that you're funny and has a nice personality, but she's too ashamed to admit that.

But that will soon change. Why? Because Malaysia will have a sexual revolution. That will be the day when girls would choose a guy for the sake of personality & sex rather than the looks & money. We will have that revolution. Don't worry guys. Your time will come.

And yes, in the issue of Islam, we know sex is a taboo. But taboos are culture and not religion. Islam does not oppose sex but they do oppose public flashing and anything pro-Wicker Man. But if you're looking for a Muslim who endorses sexual revolution through an Islamic point of view, then look no further to this lady:



And in the issue of politics, a sexual revolution may influence the next egneral elections. Sex sells, and it's time for the political parties to stop portray sex as a negative issue, and instead portray it as a positive issue. After all, who wouldn't wanna see posters like this: